The Trying Times

Probably the best commentary in the world

News

Smack That!

reporter: Jonathan, 2.5.07

Goodness me...

Sue Bradford is a Lair!

In the face of massive public rejection of her Anti-Smacking Bill Sue Bradford blames this on the 'fact' that the opponents of her bill are 'mis-informing' the public!

RUBBISH!

The only person mis-informing the public is the likes of Sue Bradford

If you go here and watch the video of Sue on Close up. At around 3:50 on the time scale Sue start to ramble about the label 'Anti-Smacking' that has been given to her Bill. She claims that it's not an Anit-Smacking bill, she never called it that, and blames this 'mis-information' on the opponents of the bill.

Then go here... a Green Party Press Release dated 6th October 2003.

Further on in the video of Close-Up Simon Barnett, who did an awesome job in the interview, explains how Sue had told him in a radio interview that if she saw him smack his child in the supermarket she would report him to the Police. He went on to ask how can he be garanteed to not face prececution for giving a light smack. Hone Harawera's responce was "don't smack your kids".

Sue and Helen stop lying to the New Zealand Public... This is an 'Anti-Smacking Bill'

6 Comments:

Yep, and then weak-kneed Key jumps on the socialist bandwagon.

Si Barnett did well. The communists couldn't answer him.

reporter - Blogger Andy Moore, at 12:12 PM, May 05, 2007 

uhhhhhhhh

reporter - Blogger Scotty, at 3:04 PM, May 10, 2007 

John and Helen didn't come up with legislation in order to try and stop children being smacked by their parents for any reason whatsoever, but Sue did.

John and Helen didn't campaign for human rights before embarking on their political career, but Sue did.

John Key is the leader of a party that is very interested in implementing into law a compulsory work for the dole scheme, while Sue Bradford is a member of a party that is very interested in everyone that works getting at least minimum wage.

reporter - Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:36 PM, May 23, 2007 

2 things:

a) Could you please not post as anonymous on my blog!!

b) I don't really understand your point?

reporter - Blogger Jonathan, at 4:40 PM, May 23, 2007 

Maybe uhhhhhhhhhhh had more relevance....

reporter - Blogger Scotty, at 7:58 AM, May 25, 2007 

uhhhhhhh

reporter - Blogger Jonathan, at 10:30 AM, May 25, 2007 

Post a Comment